juliaserano ([info]juliaserano) wrote,
@ 2007-10-23 22:32:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:frustration

Gendercator revisted
To be honest, I'm having trouble juggling all of the various anti-trans controversies these days. The ENDA issue has of course (for good reason) been the focus of much of the trans community's energy. Then there's the whole Bailey/Dreger debacle (which I am currently writing madly about).  And now, unfortunately, it seems like SF's upcoming Gendercator screening has been orchestrated so that there is little room for an actual community dialogue (which was supposedly the original point in doing the screening). Anyway, here's the forwarded post:

Please attend transphobic filmmaker event this Friday in SF!!

Supporters of ENDA have threatened to exclude transgender people from employment protections. Every other month, a letter runs in the local LGBT newspaper expressing disdain and disgust for transgender people. At last summer’s “Transforming Community” event in the SF LGBT Center, a gay man walked into trans community space and began distributing flyers against “Transsexual Mutilation,” claiming he simply wanted to start “dialogue.” And this Friday at 6:30 p.m., Center Women Presents at the SF LGBT Center will be hosting the Midwestern filmmaker whose most recent statements equate gender transition with violence, social ease, and political apathy.  These positions have been framed as a “difference of opinion” in the SF community.
 
It is incredibly important that you attend this event and speak your truth. You may need to get there early. You may need to buy tickets for friends. You may need to bring copies of her statements. And you may need to brace yourself for a frustrating evening. But please, do not allow a transphobic outsider to the community frame what an actual respectful dialogue about community tensions looks like.
 
On Friday, Oct 26 at 6:30 p.m., Center Women Presents will show Catherine Crouch’s “The Gendercator,” the film that SF’s Frameline decided to pull last summer after community concerns about Crouch’s public statements against trans people and, for those who saw the film, the depiction of trans people as coercive right-wing anti-gay villains whose very existence was a threat to queers.
 
If you missed the Frameline film fest uproar, Crouch's original publicity said that  "lesbians alter themselves into transmen" ... "instead of working to change the world." She then clarified that to say she "never mentioned" trans people--just women who take hormones and have surgery in order to be read as male. Of course, all of this was said, she explained, to "spark dialogue."
 
Shortly afterward, the LA film fest pulled “The Gendercator” from its scheduled program and showed the film by itself along with a panel; this event, said Crouch, was “unsafe,” because it allowed people an open forum to challenge her and her ideas. Subsequent events have decided not to include Crouch on their panels due to her divisive positions.
 
Friday’s “Center Women” event in San Francisco while initially well-intentioned-- has made great efforts to make sure Crouch feels “safe,” and during the process for this panel, organizers expressed concern for Crouch’s safety and respect. To that end, they have added a full panel of speakers to address everything from censorship to Crouch’s full body of film work – and not just that pesky topic of transgender marginalization within our own communities!
 
Additionally, questions will be “randomly drawn,” increasing the chance for transgender ally “censorship” and discouraging any emotional members of the public from adequately expressing themselves. Crouch’s damaging public statements (which I’ve included below) are considered by many of the panelists and organizers to be irrelevant.
 
Again, it is incredibly important that you attend this event and speak your truth – this is our Center and our community, and if it takes civil disobedience or printed materials to be heard, it is important for that to happen. It is also important that you go to witness and document the event and not allow history to be distorted, as Crouch’s “revised statements” keep attempting to do.
 
Like all communities, not every trans person agrees with Frameline’s decision to pull the film last summer, and not every lesbian or queer woman is sympathetic to Crouch’s positions. Some have emphasized that pulling the film was “censorship,” while others believe the film and Crouch’s statements are not transphobic. Others say that Crouch has valid positions because they do know one or two people who fit her criticism of an entire population.
 
Such sentiments, however, ignore the real issues: our SF community frequently does respectfully and productively criticize one another without resorting to hateful rhetoric; there is also the undeniable reality that we would not be bending over backwards to give a safe space and an open mic to anybody who made similar anti-gay or anti-lesbian statements.
 
Although Crouch keeps revising who she “meant” to target, the issue is not who or what she meant, but the ethics of judging people’s lives and bodies as cowardly or not queer enough--especially in our own venues.
 
Below are Crouch’s most recent public statements.
 
 
Director’s Note - Things are getting very strange for women these days.
More and more often we see young heterosexual women carving their bodies into porno
Barbie dolls and lesbian women altering themselves into transmen.
Our distorted cultural norms are making women feel compelled to use medical advances
to change themselves, instead of working to change the world.
This is one story, showing one possible scary future.
I am hopeful that this movie will foster discussion
about female body modification and medical ethics.
 
This remark is not about transpeople. It is about women. My understanding of transsexuality is that it is a rare condition, a medical condition of gender dysphoria. A person’s exterior body does not match their interior sense of self, causing serious social, sexual, and mental problems. This person is a transsexual, not a woman or a man. My statement was not meant to question the validity of this condition, but to call attention to the increasing number of young women who are taking testosterone or undergoing voluntary mastectomies to enhance their masculinity. These are women who formerly identified, or would be considered by the lesbian community, as butch lesbians.
 
If we situate this in terms of the larger culture’s misogyny, it seems to be a rejection of the female part of the masculine female. Why does a woman do this? Most often, the reasons given are: to avoid harassment, rape and ridicule as a gender variant. It seems to me that what is also going on, but has not been explicitly addressed, is the desire to avoid being perceived by the world at large as female. Or to avoid the label of lesbian. Some may do this because it enables their sexual fantasies.
 
 
From a ‘Movie magazine” interview:
 
What I said was that cultural norms are making
women feel compelled to use medical advances to change
themselves instead of working to change the world.
This remark is not about the trans people. It’s about
women. My statement never referred to transsexuals,
but some took it upon themselves to assume it was all
about them. It seems to me that what is also going on
but is not explicitly addressed, is a desire to avoid
being perceived by the world at large as being female,
or to avoid the label lesbian. But I think we need to
acknowledge that it has become a trend among some
young people who formerly identified as, or would be
considered by the lesbian community, as butch
lesbians. The rigid binary of a larger culture enables
this violence and harassment of the masculine woman or
effeminate male. It’s harmful to everyone, that their
safety and identity is defined by conformity to this
 Ken and Barbie model. This is what The Gendercator is
all about.
 



(Post a new comment)


[info]expanding_x_man
2007-10-24 06:10 am UTC (link)
Yes, there is a ton of it, anti-trans stuff these days. Discouraging, if not shocking.

I am somewhat burnt out on trans-issues right now, to be honest. But, I will hustle up some energy somehow, someway, for some of it.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(Reply from suspended user)

[info]scorpionturtle
2007-10-24 06:37 am UTC (link)
wow, it's sad to see that she really thinks that many trans guys are actually butch lesbians. I think it's great that she as cisgender person is able to tell who the "real" transexuals" are and who are just butch lesbians wanting to be masculine. sorry but aren't butch lesbians already masculine? I've never been a butch lesbian or a butch man, I wonder if she'd decide I was a real transexual.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]monykojuh
2008-07-16 07:11 am UTC (link)
We’d never have been friends if she hadn’t decided, one day in P. E. Class, that we would be. Just like that, she sat down next to me and said that she liked my attitude, and we were going to be friends.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]writer_grrrrl
2007-10-24 12:16 pm UTC (link)
Good for you for rallying the troops. It makes me sad when other cisgendered dykes get it so wrong ....

(This is Ariel from Ottawa, BTW)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]juliaserano
2007-10-24 01:11 pm UTC (link)
hi Ariel, good to hear from you! hope all is well! -j.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]writer_grrrrl
2007-10-24 01:20 pm UTC (link)
Things are great here ...

BTW, I referenced you in this column:
http://www.xtra.ca/public/viewstory.aspx?AFF_TYPE=1&STORY_ID=3682&PUB_TEMPLATE_ID=7

And I wrote this one shortly after you were in town:
http://www.xtra.ca/public/viewstory.aspx?AFF_TYPE=1&STORY_ID=3568&PUB_TEMPLATE_ID=7

It was so great to hang out with you when you were in town!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(Reply from suspended user)

[info]hazelsteapot
2007-10-24 06:38 pm UTC (link)
Like all communities, not every trans person agrees with Frameline’s decision to pull the film last summer, and not every lesbian or queer woman is sympathetic to Crouch’s positions.

You're normally pretty aware of these things, but I thought I should remind you to put "cissexual" before "lesbian or queer woman"--it's a true statement either way, but the version without it implicitly excludes trans women from that group.

Some have emphasized that pulling the film was “censorship,” while others believe the film and Crouch’s statements are not transphobic. ... there is also the undeniable reality that we would not be bending over backwards to give a safe space and an open mic to anybody who made similar anti-gay or anti-lesbian statements.

Another, similarly egregious example of this phenomenon: Have you seen Trans/forming Feminisms: Transfeminists Speak Out? It includes a transmisogynistic/dehumanizing article about why it's important to exclude "MTF transsexuals" [sic] from women's space. Not once does she refer to trans women as women--and this is in a supposedly transfeminist anthology.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

just a forward
[info]juliaserano
2007-10-25 12:37 pm UTC (link)
hi hazelsteapot,

with regards to the missing word "cissexual," I should point out that I didn't write that post, I was merely forwarding it. I agree with its sentiments though... -j.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: just a forward
[info]hazelsteapot
2007-10-25 05:19 pm UTC (link)
oops. It did seem uncharacteristic of you. I see the "forwarded" sentence now, I think it was just a bit too short.

I'm still upset that a monograph about "transfeminism" should a)be three fifths cis contributers, b)should include no trans people at all in its "inclusion/exclusion" section, c)should include two essays (out of five) against transwomen's inclusion in [cis] women's space; of the others, only one actively argues for it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

re: previous comment, correction
[info]hazelsteapot
2007-10-24 07:07 pm UTC (link)
correction: the subtitle is Transfeminist Voices Speak Out. There are actually two articles arguing for trans women to be shut out of womens' space, and those that argue for trans women do it in ways that still marginalize trans women.

The point is that even in this kind of publication, the marginalization and exclusion of trans women is, itself, a viable part of "transfeminism," and thus ensures that trans women's participation in feminism continues to be unsafe and contested even in the realm cisfeminists are calling "transfeminism".

(Reply to this)


[info]mae_mdwst
2007-11-06 03:43 pm UTC (link)
Thanks for posting this, unfortunately I live in Chicago so it's not like I would have been able to actually go to the screening.

I'm amazed at Crouch's statements though. She has to realize just how shitty and transphobic she being; doesn't she?


Oh, and I added you onto my "f-list", I hope you don't mind. Feel free to add back or ask me to take you off my list. And thanks for "Whipping Girl" it was a great book to read. =)

(Reply to this)


[info]anasemia
2007-11-24 11:54 pm UTC (link)
The Gendercator just screened here in Montreal, as part of Image+Nation (the lbtg film fest), as part of a collectio of "gender trouble" shorts. What astonishes me is the way many folks who insist they are transpositive either let themselves get sidetracked by the censorship red herring, or try to downplay the film as harmless fun, when Crouch herself frames it as challenging FTM transitioners. Pretty infuriating.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]juliaserano
2007-11-25 12:08 am UTC (link)
yeah, they remind me of people who insist that they are pro-gay, but then will laugh along with homophobic jokes... -j.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]anasemia
2007-11-25 03:20 pm UTC (link)
that's because they are those people, only gay.
btw, saw you read/perform/talk in toronto, a few months back. you were quite brilliant. wanted to tell you that at the after party, but i ended up at the wrong after party.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…